Israel Warns ‘Tehran Will Burn’ After Deadly Missile Barrage by Iran
Middle East Tensions Reach Boiling Point Following Unprecedented Attack
Israel Vows Retaliation After Iranian Attack
Israel has issued a stark warning to Iran following an unprecedented missile and drone attack, with senior officials declaring “Tehran will burn” in response to the assault that saw over 300 projectiles fired toward Israeli territory. The attack, launched from Iranian soil on Saturday night, marks a dangerous escalation in the long-running shadow war between the two Middle Eastern powers.
Israeli defense systems intercepted the majority of the incoming threats with assistance from U.S., British and Jordanian forces, but the psychological impact of the direct attack has shaken the region. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu convened an emergency war cabinet meeting, where hardline ministers reportedly pushed for immediate and devastating retaliation.
“This was the first direct attack on Israel from Iranian soil – a clear crossing of what had been red lines in their shadow war. The scale of the barrage was unprecedented, with more projectiles launched at Israel in these few hours than during the entire 2006 Lebanon War.” – Military Analyst David Levy
The Iranian Attack: By the Numbers
Weapons Deployed
The attack involved a complex, coordinated assault:
- 170+ drones: Slow-moving Shahed-136 models (first wave)
- 120+ ballistic missiles: Including Emad and Sejjil missiles
- 30+ cruise missiles: Launched simultaneously from Iran
- Multiple waves: Designed to overwhelm defenses
- 7 countries’ airspace: Projectiles traversed regional nations
Israeli officials confirmed a 99% interception rate of the threats.
Damage Assessment
Despite the massive barrage, impact was limited:
- 1 serious injury: 7-year-old girl wounded by shrapnel
- Minor base damage: Nevatim airbase runway hit
- Economic impact: Estimated $1B in interception costs
- Psychological effect: First direct attack from Iranian soil
- Regional response: Jordan, UK, US assisted in interceptions
The attack lasted approximately five hours from first drone launch to final interception.
Israel’s Potential Response Options
Military Retaliation
Possible military responses under consideration:
- Strategic strikes: Targeting Iranian nuclear facilities
- Symbolic attack: Limited strike on Revolutionary Guard bases
- Proxy escalation: Increased strikes on Iran’s allies in Syria
- Cyber warfare: Disabling critical infrastructure
- Assassinations: Targeting IRGC leadership abroad
Israeli officials have reportedly presented the war cabinet with “multiple response scenarios” ranging from immediate retaliation to delayed response.
Diplomatic Pressure
Non-military options being pursued:
- UN sanctions: Push for new international sanctions
- Nuclear deal: Further isolate Iran diplomatically
- Arab alliances: Strengthen regional cooperation
- ICC action: Pursue war crimes charges
- US coordination: Joint response with Western allies
The U.S. has urged Israel to show restraint, with President Biden telling Netanyahu the attack appears to have caused minimal damage.
Economic Warfare
Financial pressure options:
- Oil sanctions: Target Iranian oil exports
- Banking restrictions: Cut off financial channels
- Cyber attacks: Disrupt financial systems
- Asset seizures: Target IRGC holdings abroad
- SWIFT exclusion: Push to cut Iran from banking network
Israel has previously demonstrated capability to disrupt Iranian infrastructure through cyber operations like the Stuxnet virus.
Regional Fallout and Global Response
International Reactions
Global responses to the crisis:
- United States: Pledged “ironclad” support for Israel
- UK: Deployed RAF jets to assist interceptions
- Russia: Called for restraint from all parties
- EU: Condemned Iranian attack as “unacceptable”
- Arab States: Mostly silent or calling for de-escalation
Economic Impact
Markets and trade effects:
- Oil prices: Jumped 3% in early trading
- Shipping: Red Sea routes on high alert
- Defense stocks: Surged on interception success
- Insurance rates: Expected to rise for Middle East routes
- Tourism: Immediate cancellations to region
Historical Context of Iran-Israel Conflict
Decades of Shadow War
Key moments in the long-running conflict:
- 1979 Revolution: Shift from allies to enemies
- 1990s: Iran begins funding anti-Israel proxies
- 2000s: Nuclear program becomes flashpoint
- 2010s: Cyber warfare and covert operations escalate
- 2020s: Direct strikes between nations increase
Recent Escalations
Timeline of recent events:
- April 1: Israeli strike on Iranian consulate in Damascus
- April 11: Iran vows retaliation, moves military assets
- April 13: U.S. warns of imminent Iranian attack
- April 14: Iran launches unprecedented missile barrage
- April 15: Israel warns of coming response
Military Balance
Comparing key defense capabilities:
- Israel: Advanced air defenses, nuclear capability, U.S. backing
- Iran: Larger missile arsenal, proxy networks, geographic depth
- Air power: Israel has superior conventional air force
- Cyber: Both nations have demonstrated capability
- Nuclear: Israel confirmed, Iran suspected program
Potential Escalation Scenarios
Possible outcomes from current crisis:
- Limited response: Targeted strikes with contained fallout
- Regional war: Hezbollah enters conflict fully
- Nuclear dimension: Threats or demonstrations
- Economic warfare: Oil disruptions, cyber attacks
- Diplomatic solution: International mediation prevails
-
Israel Warns ‘Tehran Will Burn’ After Deadly Missile Barrage by Iran
A Dangerous New Phase in Middle East Conflict
The Iranian missile barrage and Israel’s vow that “Tehran will burn” in response mark a dangerous escalation in the long-running conflict between the two nations. For the first time, Iran has directly attacked Israel from its own territory rather than through proxies, crossing what had been a red line in their shadow war.
While the attack caused minimal physical damage thanks to Israel’s advanced defense systems and international assistance, the psychological and political impact is profound. The rules of engagement have changed, and the Middle East now faces the prospect of open state-to-state warfare between these bitter enemies.
The coming days will test whether cooler heads can prevail to prevent full-scale regional conflict. Much depends on Israel’s response – whether it chooses symbolic retaliation to maintain deterrence without provoking further escalation, or decides that only a devastating strike can restore its red lines. With U.S. and international leaders urging restraint but also pledging support for Israel’s right to defend itself, the world watches anxiously as this dangerous crisis unfolds.
“We are now in uncharted territory. The direct attack from Iranian soil changes decades of rules in this conflict. Israel’s response will determine whether this becomes a brief but violent episode or the start of a wider regional war that could draw in global powers.” – Former Mossad Director Ephraim Halevy
